Thursday, October 4, 2012

Advertising Its Strategies and Alternatives


        An alternative to these mainstream media messages can be a message that argues going to school and being educated is better than being objectified as nothing more than an item. Many advertisements shove the idea that women need to be perfect otherwise they are not valuable constantly in their eyes. One example is how Naomi Wolf explains, how after World War II when women went back home and were no longer working, the idea of being a good housewife, was no longer making advertisers money (Wolf 64). The advertisers then had the idea that having women be obsessed with beauty in female magazines, would be profitable for them, the advertisers (Wolf 64). For example, Wolf says that “somehow, somewhere, someone must have figured out that that they will buy more things if they are kept in the self-hating, ever-failing, hungry, and sexually insecure state of being aspiring “beauties”(Wolf 66). Here Wolf explains that advertisement’s and magazines introduce an unrealistic idea that women must always look pretty and that if they do not achieve this goal they are not only not pretty, but not a valuable person anymore (Wolf 66). This was only a method for the advertisers to make money but was also a successful way to make women fall into being insecure about themselves, thus, causing them to spend time hating themselves and working towards an unrealistic goal of looking like the models in the advertisements (Wolf 66).
           In addition, mainstream media also argues that women (but also men too) are only valuable as objects that are usually sexualized  (Cortese 54). For example, Anthony Cortese’s article “Constructed Bodies, Deconstructing Ads Sexism in Advertising”, discusses how both men and women are objectified in the media and how the idealized image is not even real (Cortese 54). He claims that, “ads portray women as sex objects (figure 3.20) or mindless domestics pathologically obsessed with cleanliness” (figure 3.21) (quoting Kilbourne 1989). As well as that “the perfect provocateur is not human; rather, she is a form or hollow shell representing a female figure” (Cortese 54) and that “this ultimate image is not real. It can only be achieved artificially through the purchase of vast quantities of beauty products (Kilbourne 1989)...Even the models themselves do not look in the flesh as impeccable as they are depicted in ads. The classic image is constructed through cosmetics, photography, and air brushing techniques” (Cortese 54). This idea is unrealistic and unattainable because it uses measures such as computerization advancements and therefore argues that its consumers must look like the computer constructed models (Cortese 54). It is unfair then to argue that people should emulate these unrealistic computer sculpted images. Assuming that women do purchase all of these makeup products, they would still not look like the person shown in the photo, because that person is not what they would look like in actuality (Cortese 54). Jean Kilbourne in “Beauty and the Beast of Advertising” elaborates on how women are constantly forced to not be satisfied with themselves and accept validation of themselves from others’. She says that “[s]he is made to feel dissatisfied with and ashamed of herself, whether she tries to achieve ‘the look’ or not. Objectified constantly by others, she learns to objectify herself” (Kilbourne 123-4). She demonstrates that as a result women give up the ability to love themselves and be the individual they want to be, as well as becoming objects (Kilbourne 123-4). Women then no longer care what they think of themselves but what others think of them (Kilbourne 124). 
         Even young girls are being told through advertisements that they have to look a certain way to be valuable and to get a males attention (Kilbourne The More You Subtract 132). They are told that who they are as a person does not matter and will not help them keep their male counterparts attention (Kilbourne 132). She makes this claim when she is talking about an advertisement, saying that  it says ‘“[h]e says that the first thing that he noticed about you is your great personality, says an ad featuring a very young woman in tight jeans….[h]e lies” (Kilbourne 132)  and that “If this is your idea of a great catch, says an ad for a cosmetic kit from a teen magazine featuring a cute boy, this is your tackle box”. As a result Kilbourne goes on to explain that young women do then believe that they can look like the unrealistic images in magazines and will try with all of their effort to do so (Kilbourne 132). She explains that advertisements are then part of our culture in making the viewer believe that they must resemble perfection and beauty as the advertisements see fit (Kilbourne 132). Susan Douglass explains how advertisements cause the spectators to have many mixed, contradictory emotions and how their opinions and selves are lined along those of the media (Douglass 9). She says, “[t]he media, of course, urged us to be pliant, cute, sexually available, thin, blonde, poreless, wrinkle-free and deferential to men. But it is easy to forget that the media also suggested we could be rebellious, tough, enterprising, and shrewd…The jigsaw pieces of our inner selves have moved around in relation to the jigsaw imagery  of the media” (Douglass 9). Douglass explains here that spectators allow their views to be shaped by the media. When they have the ability to speak out against it, they do not always do so but instead accept what they have heard or seen (Douglass 9).  
          However it should be acknowledge that advertisings do not just try to sell products to make a profit but instead that there are groups of people who are in activist groups who try to send a positive message to accomplish a goal that they have (Cortese 48). For example, Cortese speaks about how there were advertisements that wanted to help find homeless people shelter and warn against the dangers of pesticides in snakes (Cortese 48). In my own advertisement, I want to have images of women, some of them wearing glasses, with the slogan, “Smart is the new sexy.” Next to those images I want to have women in suits with another caption saying “this woman is the head CEO of her company, and that’s hot” and lastly “This woman is a doctor and that’s attractive”. Within my advertisement, women are not objects of products, and they not being told they need to look a certain way. They do not have a product being shoved in their face telling them that they have to look a certain way to be important. The models are not all of the same race and they are acknowledge for their mind, not their body. My advertisement encourages education and career that is not just exclusive to men. My advertisement:
This women is the head CEO of her company and that’s hot
 This women is a doctor and that’s attractive.
         Smart is the new sexy

 Education and Career are Not just for men Anymore.

        

         What is also interesting about advertisements is that they do not, according to Douglas Kellner, want to just force their ideas on how people should look, or how they should live their lives, but how they will be viewed if they do a certain task, such as smoking (Kellner 129). One of the topics that Kellner talks about is how cigarette companies advertised how if men smoked they would be considered a “real” man (Kellner 128). For example, he says that the “‘Marlboro Man campaign was an attempt to capture the male cigarette market with images of archetypically masculine characters. Since the cowboy Western image provided a familiar icon of masculinity, independence and ruggedness, it was the preferred symbol for the campaign’” (Kellner 127). Here Kellner explains that the cigarette/advertising company was able to use the symbol to portray what they felt an ideal man should be. An ideal man, they illustrated, was someone who smoked a cigarette. This company was not just trying to sell a product, but also an ideal image. Another goal of advertisers. They did the same thing to convince women to buy their product and smoke (Kellner 128). They did so by claiming that a cigarette became a symbol of freedom, hip, modern, and liberal women (Kellner 128). For example, the Virginia Slims company had an advertisement claiming, “You’ve come a long way baby” (Kellner 128). Kellner discusses that the Virginia Slims ad was trying to appeal to women by convincing them that it was alright for them to smoke because society had made it socially acceptable and that it was alright to buy and use a “male” product. Another interesting idea of advertising, according to Danae Clark, is that there is another market that advertisers try to, but not always include, gays and lesbians. Clark explains that certain advertisements can appeal to these consumers that heterosexual consumers would not notice (Clarke 144). As previously stated, the goal of many advertisers is to make a profit, but they can also help lesbian individuals avoid being ostracized if they dress in a heterosexual manner (Clark 148). Clark says that “…gay window advertising appropriates lesbian subcultural style, incorporates its features into commodified representations, and offers it back to lesbian consumers in a packaged form cleansed of identity politics” (Clark 148). Clark explains that advertisers use some of the language/codes that lesbian individuals would understand, then offer them a heterosexual way of dressing, which would help avoid in them being taunted by others (Clark 148). Here the goal of the advertisers other than producing a product, is allowing their consumers to not be harassed by others (Clark 148). In addition this method is interesting because they use techniques their consumers could understand both for a profit, and an identity.
          Lastly while many advertisers have sent negative messages to women and young women, as well as men, there has been an attempt to fight against a media that sent negative messages to women. Which was Ms. Magazine’s beginning. Ms. Magazine was a magazine made for women that featured advertisement but not accompanying articles that spoke about the product (Steinem 112). Due to the fact that Ms. Magazine had the reputation for addressing the issues of women and feminism, that were not generally discussed, they were often not able to gain advertisements by many powerful businesses (Steinem 112). Not writing articles about the product, was also unhelpful. For example Steinem discusses how she tried to persuade Estee Lauder to have his advertisement in the magazine he refused because he believed that the product would conflict with his usual consumers and ideology (Steinem 119).  Steinem claims that “[h]e concedes that beauty features are often concocted more for advertisers than readers. But Ms isn’t appropriate for his ads anyway, he explains. Why? Because Estee Lauder is selling ‘a kept-woman mentality’’’ (Steinem 119). Ms. struggled with keeping their magazine alive with powerful helpful messages and the fight against pressures from advertising's still exist today. Although, it is important to try and remember who one is and not succumb to advertising pressures and be happy with oneself. That in fact, the model in the glossy pages may indeed be air brushed. As well as that one must be able to think about themselves and the world, in the way they want to, not in the manner some else want them to.

To Dove campaigns working to raise self esteem for young girls.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ei6JvK0W60I            
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gUsKIApTewQ&feature=related

hfarraj
Hasnah Farraj

          Bibliography

Clark, Danae. “Commodity Lesbianism.” Gender, Race and Class in Media.  Ed. Gail Dines, Jean M. Humez. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc, 2003.142-151.

Cortese, Anthony. “Constructed Bodies, Deconstructing Ads: Sexism in Advertising.” Provocateur Images of Women and Minorities in Advertising. United States Of America, 2004.45-76.Print.  

Douglas, J Susan. “Introduction”. Where the Girls Are Growing Up Female with the Mass Media. 1995.  3-20. Print.

Kellner, Douglas. “Reading Images Critically Toward a Postmodern Pedagogy.” Gender, Race and Class in Media.  Ed. Gail Dines, Jean M. Humez. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc, 2003.126-132.

Kilbourne, Jean. “Beauty and the Beast of Advertising”. Gender, Race and Class in Media.  Ed. Gail Dines, Jean M. Humez. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc, 2003.121-125.

Kilbourne, Jean. “The More You Subtract, The More You Add Cutting Girls Down To Size.” Gender, Race and Class in Media.  Ed. Gail Dines, Jean M. Humez. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc, 2003.128-154.

Steinem, Gloria. “Sex, Lies and Advertising.” Gender, Race and Class in Media.  Ed. Gail Dines, Jean M. Humez. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc, 2003. 112-120.

Wolf, Naomi. “Culture”. The Beauty Myth How Images of Beauty Are Used Against Women. United States Of America, 2002. 58-85. Print.


First Image:
http://cf.ltkcdn.net/plussize/images/std/81822-270x425-Pspsuit.jpg

Second Image:
http://atlah.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/african-american-female-doctor.jpg
Third Image:
http://www.framesdirectblog.com/wp-content/uploads/womens-eyeglasses-overview.jpg









Gender in Advertising


“You can never be too rich or too thin, girls are told. This mass delusion sells a lot of products. It also causes enormous suffering, involving girls in false quests for power and control…”

Every minute of everyday we are surrounded by advertisements. Throughout our upbringings, we are bombarded with the different ideals and tactics of corporations through their advertisements. Ads influence so much of our daily lives. Besides showing the latest trends, they influence young people and help them decide how to view the opposite sex and their own gender as well. Kilbourne exemplifies this in the piece, ‘Beauty and the Beast of Advertising’ when she states, “the most powerful educational force in society.” Because advertising is something we are constantly surrounded by and it is a huge part of our culture, children learn from it and take its messages as a lesson on how issues of gender and sexuality translate into their lives.

            Images of women in advertising have developed over time. Societal and political issues have influenced and shaped many changes in advertisements and how women are portrayed. In class we discussed advertising during World War II and then how it quickly changed after that. During the war, women were shown as strong individuals that had to step up and do their part (i.e. Rosie the Riveter). Later, when men returned home from the war, tides changed and women regressed so much in society and in how they were portrayed. Women became the noble housewives and their appearance; both physically and in their homes were advertised to women’s most coveted successes.

After many struggles, women moved away from this stereotype. Then began the beauty war: a war that pins women against her innermost self. It advertises the perfect woman, also known as the unachievable. It is a non-stop battle that women cannot overcome. In recent times, the image of women in ads has been one of overt sexuality and objectification. Kilbourne defines the ideal woman in our society, stating that she is  "a mannequin, a shell. Conventional beauty is her only attribute... she has no lines or wrinkles... no scars or blemishes." Cortese also helps define advertisers and their different strategies in the piece, ‘Constructed Bodies.’ One of his most powerful quotes is when he states, “What kind of representations does advertising produce? It creates a mythical, WASP-oriented world in which no one is ever ugly, overweight, poor, toiling, or physically or mentally disabled..” This truly shows how advertisers attempt to appeal to their audiences. All your troubles will go away if you buy our product. Despite the advances of women in society, women constantly struggle with this battle to be perfect. The effect this has on young girls is immense and many girls develop body image issues to attempt to fulfill what they think they need to be. Boys are affected too. They see women being sexualized and that’s the image they expect from the girls around them. It is a cycle of influence that shapes how girls view themselves and how others view them, which also relates back to Berger and his article about the male gaze.

Personally, Kilbourne’s "The More You Subtract The More You Add: Cutting Girls Down to Size" was powerful in expressing advertising’s affects on young women. “Primarily girls are told by advertisers that what is most important about them is their perfume, their clothing, their bodies, their beauty. Their "essence" is their underwear.” Advertisers want girls to feel like they cannot live without their product. They do this by belittling the reader and making them feel like if they get this product, they will be one step closer to achieving the image of perfection. Kilbourne further states, “Even more destructively, they get the message that this is possible, that, with enough effort and self-sacrifice, they can achieve this ideal. Thus many girls spend enormous amounts of time and energy attempting to achieve something that is not only trivial but also completely unattainable.” In Kilbourne’s other piece, Beauty and the Beast of Advertising, she acknowledges that adolescence is the target audience because they are vulnerable. Advertisers play with this vulnerability and make girls feel insignificant. Girls go to extremes to try to achieve this perfect image. Ads tell us “we can and should remake our bodies into perfect commodities.” Young girls develop eating disorders, habits of self-harm, and other issues to deal with the hatred they have for their appearances.

 What does this all mean? Women, especially young women need to become more educated on advertisements as misrepresentations. We need to teach them to be aware of the beauty myth, instead of letting them fall victims to it. The problem is that these strategies are deep routed. For example, in ‘Reading Images Critically,’ Kellner states, “In fact, Lucky Strikes carried out a successful advertising campaign in the 1930s which associated smoking with weight reduction…“Reach for a Lucky instead of a sweet.” These images have been successful for a long time. The best way to combat this is to create a new advertsing strategy that appeals to young girls that depict women’s body in a positive way. Dove’s campaign ‘Love the skin you’re in’ is an excellent example of this. Let’s educate young girls so that they understand advertiser’s tactics and outsmart them by not letting their messages dictate their purchases, understanding that they are not objects, and help them develop healthy habits with their own bodies.

Instead of this...

Let's try this...

educating girls on the realities of advertising.

  
Demi Lovato's campaign with Seventeen Magazine: 
Love is Louder than the pressure to be prefect.


Cortese, Anthony. “Constructed Bodies, Deconstructing Ads: Sexism in Advertising.” Provocateur Images of Women and Minorities in Advertising. 2004.  

Kellner, Douglas. “Reading Images Critically Toward a Postmodern Pedagogy.” Gender, Race and Class in Media. 2003.


Kilbourne, Jean. “The More You Subtract, The More You Add Cutting Girls Down To Size.” 
“Beauty and the Beast of Advertising." Gender, Race and Class in Media. 2003.

Wednesday, October 3, 2012

Dear Women, Wake up!

Is there any such thing as protection of women from the media? Perhaps, a way in which they can be represented in a more positive way? It’s hard to say because society is used to the roles being given to them, without their ability to take it and redefine themselves. Women have continually been deconstructed and used for their body, ridiculed for their mind, and stripped of the possibility for individuality. John Berger discusses the origin of this male viewpoint through advertisers in Ways of Seeing. Jean Kilbourne talks more explicitly about the problem of bodily expectations through images in The More you Subtract, The More you Add and Beauty and the Beast of Advertising. Lastly, Naomi Wolf lets us into how a culture and ideal of beauty continues to be spread through the medium of magazines in Culture. All of these readings reflect how the expectations of advertisers and corporations affect the woman psyche. Unfortunately, it’s harder to contemplate a solution than to evaluate the issue at hand.
    
The problem I find is not that woman are unaware of how they are being represented through media sources, but that they have been willing (and for so long) to accept the images. Berger blatantly explains how media merged off of this idea of power in the male gaze and, ultimately, its judgment, “Paris awards the apple to the woman he finds most beautiful. Thus beauty becomes competitive…Those who are not judged beautiful are not beautiful. Those who are, are given the prize,” (52). A man’s presence is external, carries confidence, and shows that he automatically has the upper hand, whereas a woman’s presence is internal, self-reflective, and, therefore, submissive. From this idea, specific poses for women were placed in Renaissance paintings, where “nakedness reveals itself. Nudity is placed on display,” and “to be naked is to be oneself. To be nude is to be seen naked by others and yet not recognized for oneself,” (54). In absolute truth, this is how women are taken apart in modern-day advertisements and worked with as objects like bear bottles, shoes, brooms and other props. In great detail, Berger presents the contrast between the surveyor and the surveyed- the male and the female. This point alone should be means for change, as the idea of constantly being watched and measured accordingly with others being watched is quite disturbing. Before Renaissance portraits, who said that men get to expect sex appeal and submissiveness from women?, “Often…she looks out of the picture towards the one who considers himself her true lover- the spectator-owner,” (56). All of the paintings that Berger refers to reveal the same voyeuristic quality and women’s bodies being used as tempting tools for men’s pleasure. But when did society decide that the male sex would be the stalker-like-predator and the female sex would be condemned as victims?

 
Younger and younger girls are now using the media as a source for news or safety from being the scapegoat of popular culture. This is why there needs to be more alternative media that opposes mainstream ideals in their greed for bigger pockets, and is inclusive of the same crowd mainstream advertisers are targeting. One major issue Kilbourne presents (that has forever been implied within media imagery) is the expectation of women to be “seen and not heard”, “In ad after ad girls are urged to be ‘barely there’—beautiful but silent,” (138). The continuous encouragement of women succumbing (as consumers) to beauty products and self-alteration is the reason for confusion among the youth.  If women were to be exposed more to the truth behind what these advertisements imply, they'd be mortified. Basically, a "harmless" ad for perfume that reads "Classic is speaking your mind (without saying a word)," (138) can lead to girls growing up afraid to "use their voices to protect themselves from a variety of dangers," (139). What happens when a girl is confronted by a guy at a party who wants to "dub"? I see young girls dancing inappropriately at parties all the time, but when I ask them for their preference, most say they'd rather not rub their butt up against some dude on the dance floor. So, why do they? On a more serious note, what happens when the same guy wants to have sex later? Should women be forced to reestablish the way they think about rape, too? Kilbourne's straightforward evaluation of goals in the media is what should be better spread among people who deny themselves as feminist, "Advertising creates a mythical, WASP-oriented world in which no one is ever ugly, overweight, poor, struggling or disabled," (Beauty and the Beast of Advertising, 122).



 



Young women often don’t know how to feel empowered without giving into consumerism and what advertisers continue to unravel for the potential customer. Wolf talks about the duality in magazines and how it makes women feel safe and involved in the world, but only limits them to trivial things like sex and cosmetics, "They blur the line between editorial freedom and the demands of the marketplace," (77). This degradation makes us feel hopeless as a social group, but we need a balance of more images that battle that in order to feel like there’s anything we can do to shift the poor and short sided expectations of women. Women continue to identify and measure their own physical beauty with that of other women, which only perpetuates the images of what beauty should be, "Women can tend to resent each other if they look too 'good' and dismiss one another if they look too 'bad'," (75). Wolf exerts the truth in that magazines targeted at women are meant to make them feel included in popular culture and included in an exclusive feminist group. This should not be comforting, when in fact these images and stories only help us understand that desirable rewards only go to the "beautiful", and the women with actual opinions are dismissed as "not beautiful", but...just smart? 




(Ad- proof of gender roles once more...Is a woman's idea of pleasure bringing pleasure to a man?)