“Advertising
has become sexual harassment,” (James B. Twitchell of Adult USA, as cited by
Cortese). An “overlooked method of socialization,” (Kellner) advertising has
successfully created an unnatural cultural schism between men and women, and
between hetero and homosexuals. Companies invest money into creating a
mythical, WASPy, perfect world that emphasizes taught gender identity
(Cortese). In fact, “U.S. society invests over $102 billion a year into
advertising, fully two percent of our gross national product, far more money
than education,” (Kellner). This money funds a growing, unseen divide in our
population, one that is neither beneficial to our society nor necessary to sell
goods.
The
current accepted advertising strategy is to create a problem and increase
anxiety, convincing customers that they need a product to act as a solution
(Cortese). Unfortunately, because “US makers continue to be uncomfortable
addressing women,” (Steinem) ads often play on women’s anxiety to achieve that
mythical, perfect norm, as well as on the expectation that men should confirm
women’s anxieties. Ads either call forth the “perfect provocateur” or take a
postmodernist approach, using slogans such as “Relax. You’re ok. Improve your
beer,” to relate to customers who already feel that they are wiser than the
industry (Cortese).
However, they are usually not. We do
need to improve our industry, to portray real people and beneficial ideals in
our ads, and to stop alienating women from important positions in society.
Today’s ads sell by conveying that “a great man risks all for intellectual
daring,” while “things happen” to a beautiful woman (Wolf). Frustratingly, in
ads, “women are allowed a mind or body, but not both” (Wolf). To counter this,
real women must participate in the making of ads. They must be able to take on
leadership roles in the industry, and put themselves in positions that allow
them to portray the true ideals of women in the thousands of ads that bombard
our society every day. Ads that say so much about who we are as women and men,
that give us a sense of what we can and cannot do as women and men, must be
developed by both women and men.
Ann Fudge, a former CEO of Young & Rubicam Brands, was inspired by
Martin Luther King’s assassination in the 1960s; the chaos surrounding his
death and the realization that African American women, like herself, were not
portrayed as high achieving people inspired her to break the glass ceiling, complete
her education, and enter the realm of marketing. There, she was able to promote
the idea that real people can dictate what ads look like, and that ads can
portray real people. Anne Fudge eventually went on to join President Obama’s
National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform. Pamela El, an African
American woman who was formerly the VP of marketing at State Farm, is known for
expanding State Farm’s business by promoting ads that related to real people.
Her ads were relatively gender neutral, and catered to both younger and older
drivers. El even went on to receive Marketing Exexutive of the Year title in
2008, all without propagating gender and racial divisions in advertising. In fact, some of the most successful marketing professionals have been women who have avoided establishing a gender divide in their ads.
“'…women don’t understand technology,’ say executives at the end of ad
presentations. ‘Maybe not,’ we respond, ‘but neither do men- and we all buy
it,’” writes Gloria Steinem of Ms. magazine’s
struggle to stay afloat in an increasingly sexist ad industry that does not
appeal to its readers. In fact, there is no reason to demean gender or leave
out race or sexual orientation to run a successful ad campaign. “It’s obvious
that Ms. can’t exclude lesbians and
serve women,” (Steinem) and it’s obvious that successful ads can’t serve
society and exclude women. “Quit using our cans to sell yours,” (women on beer,
Cortese).
Clark, Danae. “Commodity Lesbianism.” P142-151.
Clark, Danae. “Commodity Lesbianism.” P142-151.
Cortese, Anthony. “Constructed Bodies, Deconstructed Ads, Sexism in Advertising.”
Kellner, Douglas. “Reading Images Critically: Toward a Postmodern Pedagogy.” P126-132
Steinem, Gloria. “Sex Lies and Ads.” P114-120.
Wolf, Naomi. “Culture.” The Beauty Myth.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.